
He becomes a “lessons learned” chapter in someone’s concealed carry class.
I want you to look at this post, then I will explain my position (as if you don’t already know)
I once tried peer to peer lending as one of the lenders. I wanted to see if it worked or not. I ‘invested’ $1000 in Prosper. Here is how I remember it working: a person applies for a loan. The application, along with the person’s pertinent financial information (Credit score, income, etc.) is listed. You as an investor can then offer to fund some of the loan. Once the loan is fully funded, the lenders offering the lowest interest rates are the ones who fund the loan. At the end of the bidding period, those people are the ones who ultimately fund the loan. All loans are for 36 months and are unsecured. Example:
Person wants to borrow $3,000.
Person A agrees to loan $1000 at 18 percent. Person B $2000 at 18 percent. Now that the loan is fully funded, others can come in and offer to fund it at lower interest. Person C agrees to lend $1500 at 16 percent, then Person D agrees to $2000 at 14%. In the end, the loan funds at 13.4%, with a monthly payment of $101.66. The total of all 36 payments for that $3000 loan is $3,659.79.
I decided to put $1000 into my account to see what would happen. (My first loan was for $50. I was repaid $35 of it) so I added more funds, and I loaned that money out to other people. The interest rates were all sky high, 14 percent or higher, and I didn’t choose a single person with bad credit. All had credit scores that were higher than 650. Two of the three of them had defaulted before the end of the first year. I only got back about $140 of the thousand I had invested.
That was 13 years ago. I have learned a lot about money, business, and finance since then. Now I know why they are charged so much.
Why? Because each and every one of those people had already tried to get a loan through a conventional process, and couldn’t. The reason was that they are all high risk borrowers. If a given pool of people has a 10% risk of defaulting on a loan, a lender has to charge enough interest to cover the cost of servicing the loan, plus enough to cover those who will default. The higher the chances are of default, the higher the interest rates need to be in order to make the loan financially feasible. If you have a 10% chance of defaulting, then the lender needs to charge that 10% to compensate for risk, another percent or two to cover office and other administrative expenses, and some for profit. You are now staring at 14 or even 16 percent.
Make charging interest illegal, then loaning someone money without interest means they might as well set it on fire. All lending will simply stop. I’ve posted on this enough times, that if you still don’t understand it, it’s because you are either obtuse or being deliberately contrary.
There are no opinions on this- it’s a mathematical fact. It’s just how money works.
If trans women are really women, then why would a biological woman be angry that she was confused with a trans woman? Because deep down, even the left knows that trans women are really men.
San Francisco schools are closed today because their teachers are on strike. The largest part of their demand is access to the same healthcare benefits enjoyed by their illegal immigrant students.
The district announced that schools would be closed Tuesday and urged parents to check the district website “for learning, food, childcare, and district support resources.
Fully half of all San Francisco students are illegals, or the anchor babies of illegal immigrant parents. Illegal immigrant households get free healthcare. I understand why teachers feel that it is unfair that they have to pay healthcare costs when their students don’t. You know what?
I also don’t care.
The teachers voted for this. Elections have consequences.
I have seen a meme on social media, something about “Arguing with a leftist largely consists of them deliberately pretending to not understand something that is obvious, and then arguing against that misstated position.” What you are describing is a logical fallacy called a strawman argument. We see it everywhere. I don’t think its entirely ignorance, I think in many cases the leftist you are arguing with knows they are being disingenuous, but they are hoping others are too stupid to know it.
A leftist blog complains about a gun dealer who has lost his FFL, stopped selling actual firearms, and pivots to selling parts and accessories for firearms. One of the major misstatements is this:
The M16 bolt carrier group is the part worth flagging. It’s legal to own and common in semi-auto builds. But it’s also a prerequisite for converting an AR-15 to full-automatic because the geometry of a standard AR-15 carrier won’t work with an auto sear.
Of course, they fail to mention that there are several parts required to convert an AR15 into full auto, and the full auto BCG is only one of them. The one the ATF has chosen to define as the key component of converting an AR15 to a machine gun is the auto sear. If an FA BCG is legal to own, then why wouldn’t the store be able to sell them?
The blog article then meanders off topic into the non sequitur of COVID death rates in the same county where the gun dealer is located:
People there apparently were so anti-life, they maintained the highest death rate from COVID-19 compared to any other county in the nation: One death out of every 132 people.
before pivoting into yet another accusation that this is because they are all racist there because something racist once happened there:
Speaking of heavily armed white supremacists being anti-life, Mann today still lives in an area known for the 1989 naming of “noose road“, near a sundown town of many lynchings. It was said in Hays, Kansas that “Blacks were not allowed to stay overnight”, keeping alive a Jim Crow “legacy that kind of hung over the town going back to the lynching.”
Then goes on to babble about another unrelated meandering:
On the same day Custombilt filed for bankruptcy, California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a lawsuit against distribution of 3D-printable ghost gun files and machine gun conversion devices. One state is suing over digital blueprints. Another is goosing a revoked dealer to liquidate physical machine gun components from a bankruptcy warehouse into unknown “noose” hands, no questions asked.
Showing that the left doesn’t REALLY support the First Amendment, or they would realize publishing plans is protected speech. Still, that last quote is about as coherent as Joe Biden rambling about Corn Pop and children braiding his leg hair. (That’s how you use a non sequitur for maximum effect.)
I am absolutely sure that the Democrats are going to lecture him about the separation of church and state in 3..2..1..
There are people in comments who still believe this national ship can be saved, that somehow the nation can right itself, if only we elect the right people. Let me explain why that can’t- and more importantly, won’t happen.
We currently have a $40 trillion national debt. Here is how it breaks down:
We are 8th in the top 10 largest debtor nations in the world.
Just two years ago, we were tied for 10th place with Bahrain.
Repudiating this debt will destroy pension funds and savings of US citizens more than it will hurt others. Of course, that will have to happen eventually, and when it does, the US economy will completely tank.
The US has a huge budget deficit. Last fiscal year, the US government spent $7 trillion, but only collected $5.2 trillion in taxes. To illustrate the scope, it only cost $296 billion to fight all 4 years of World War 2 ($4 trillion in today’s dollars).
Every voter in the US has their own pet projects they don’t want cut. The fact is, about 60% of the residents of the US gets more in Federal funding than they pay in taxes, and there is no recovering from that. To illustrate- what would you say if DJT announced tomorrow that to save the nation, the entire Social Security and Medicare system was ending on January 21, but the taxes would remain in order to pay off the massive $40 trillion in debt? Would you:
That’s why we have a deficit in the first place. Any politician who votes to cut those pet projects will get voted out of office. Imagine someone voting to stop paying Social Security, Welfare, Medicare, the military, or any other project that people consider to be important to them. Fill in the project that’s important to you, and you will see the issue. If ~60% of people are net recipients in an annual sense, asking them to accept an immediate, visible hit to their lifestyle is fighting three stacked disadvantages:
That combination is why austerity platforms almost always lose in normal times. It just isn’t possible to change our nation’s course. Voting won’t change it. Politicians work to provide graft for themselves, while at the same time sending money to their base constituency. Call it doomsaying, call it black pill, call it what you want- but saying that we can vote our way out of this is foolishly mistaken. There are no cuts, no magic wand waving, and no solution that the people of this nation will accept until they are forced to accept it. This only ends when the current system collapses.
Whatever your own personal theory on how to save this sinking fiscal ship, there isn’t one that enough people will accept that will be doable in an electoral sense. It just isn’t going to happen. Instead of fixing it, we kept kicking the can down the road, and we will continue to do so until it all collapses.
This isn’t a new thing- I have been telling people this for 20 years.
So what will happen? The lesson is found over and over again in history books. Economic collapse will create hard times. People will demand that the government fix things. Once voters believe that some scapegoat:
are insulated or there is some gaming of the system, support collapses instantly. Even small symbolic elite sacrifice can matter more than the raw dollars. At that point, the electorate demands that something be done.
Those arguments persuade analysts, not electorates. Thinking people, capable of reason. There are people that read this very blog, perhaps even you, who are seeking scapegoats. Instead of asking 60% to accept cuts, democracies tend to choose:
These spread losses invisibly and avoid direct electoral punishment. So what tends to happen when an electorate kicks the can down the road over and over again, until the inevitable happens, and the can just can’t be kicked any further?
This is one of those questions where history is depressingly consistent. When electorates repeatedly defer pain and the system finally hits a hard constraint (currency, credit, or productive capacity breaks) the outcome tends to follow a fairly predictable sequence. The details vary by country, but the pattern shows up again and again.
For a long time, reality is abstract:
Then something snaps:
This is the moment when credibility collapses faster than the economy. People don’t just lose money, they lose trust in the system’s promises.
Once the can truly can’t be kicked:
The technical cause of collapse (debt, demographics, productivity) becomes irrelevant. Politics turns moral and tribal. I believe that we are in the later portions of Stage 1, and the beginning portions of Stage 2.
Normal rules die quickly. Governments reach for:
These measures are rarely optimal—but they are fast, visible, and politically palatable. The goal shifts from efficiency to maintaining order. This is likely the point where our government as we know it is gone. We will essentially have a Communist/Socialist government, and even though caused by profligate government spending, capitalism and capitalists will be blamed for the failure.
As institutions lose credibility:
At this point, the social contract is already broken, even if the flag still flies over the ruins.
Once the pain is unavoidable, the electorate rewrites history. Typical narratives:
The scapegoats pay the price. Rarely do electorates say: “We voted for this path over decades.” Responsibility is externalized because collective guilt is politically unusable. This is when the scapegoats are imprisoned or even slaughtered.
Partial economic recovery at the cost of liberty. This is historically the most common outcome.
This requires exceptional institutional strength and social trust. Rare, but real. I think this is the least likely path that will occur here. There is not enough national unity and too much tribalism for that to occur in the US.
I think this is less likely than than authoritarianism.
This is what history says happens time and time again. History doesn’t repeat, but it sure does rhyme.
The way things are going, I think we are going to see a communist dictatorship, unless the US gun owning public joins the fray. I don’t see that as being likely, however, for the same reason why people won’t vote to cut their own benefits for the public good. If a person won’t vote for fiscal martyrdom for the public good, they certainly won’t elect to throw themselves into the civil war meat grinder.
No, the right will continue to sit on the sidelines, claiming that the time isn’t right to act, until it is too late for that to help. This ship is going down, and there is nothing to be done but hope it won’t happen during your lifetime.
11 Republicans have joined Democrats in an Amnesty Bill for illegal immigrants, called the “Dignity Act of 2025.” It offers 7-year, renewable legal status with work authorization to illegal immigrants who pay $7,000 in restitution. In other words, amnesty. Give it a few years, and illegals will have full voting rights, and you as a taxpayer will be funding it forever.
Donald Trump was voted into office on one major platform- curbing illegal immigration. In response, Republicans are doing what they have always done in response to gun control: They pay lip service to a voting bloc, whether that bloc is gun owners or those opposing illegal immigration, get elected on that platform, then as soon as it becomes politically convenient to do so, turn their backs on those groups who elected them.
My prediction is this: If this bill gets passed, it is the end of the MAGA movement. Those who voted for its promises will disengage, myself included. There is no point in electing Republicans, if those Republicans will simply vote for the exact same things as Democrats. The result is the same, the only difference is who gets to cash in on sweet taxpayer graft.
Let this pass, and I won’t vote in another election. Not ever.
It’s been tried before
Democrats just can’t think of any other way to keep their slaves on the plantation.
The debate over property taxes continues. The left claims that property taxes are necessary for things like the fire department and schools, but it’s hard to make that case while local governments are using those taxes to help people break the law…